Skip to content

Settings and activity

3 results found

  1. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    johnfaig shared this idea  · 
  2. 1,472 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    johnfaig commented  · 

    Vlad1 - I saw your post about solving the problem with "thought groups". Please expand on this. I'm not sure that I understand

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    johnfaig commented  · 

    Vlad1 - I saw your post about solving the problem with "thought groups". Please expand on this. I'm not sure that I understand

    johnfaig shared this idea  · 
  3. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    johnfaig commented  · 

    This goes along with my request for more strongly types note attributes. If you embrace attributes, then do it at the link and node level. When a user queries the brain, there should be an option to include links, nodes or both.

    johnfaig supported this idea  ·