Yes, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea, so I would like to add some points, in the hope that the huge improvement of the idea for PB as brain-simulator is even clearer.
1. Links of many thoughts in our regular brains are virtual, fuzzy association, or implied. The idea will allow for a far more intuitive dynamic.
2. Flexible in-note links would be extension of the visible links between thoughts. It would be the added functionality of links without arrows, a vast improvement, and 'higher-order' extension of the idea of link arrows and one-way link arrows on the map itself.
3. The main brain map would be far less cluttered.
4. I am setting up a philosophy thought map, integrated with mediawiki, but it sure would even better if it were more fully integrated.
To repeat, it seems implicit linking would make PB very significantly more like human brains.
Pierre Rousseau
supported this idea
·
Yes, I wholeheartedly agree with this idea, so I would like to add some points, in the hope that the huge improvement of the idea for PB as brain-simulator is even clearer.
1. Links of many thoughts in our regular brains are virtual, fuzzy association, or implied. The idea will allow for a far more intuitive dynamic.
2. Flexible in-note links would be extension of the visible links between thoughts. It would be the added functionality of links without arrows, a vast improvement, and 'higher-order' extension of the idea of link arrows and one-way link arrows on the map itself.
3. The main brain map would be far less cluttered.
4. I am setting up a philosophy thought map, integrated with mediawiki, but it sure would even better if it were more fully integrated.
To repeat, it seems implicit linking would make PB very significantly more like human brains.