Skip to content

Settings and activity

9 results found

  1. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    tonja shared this idea  · 
  2. 282 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    tonja supported this idea  · 
  3. 418 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    tonja commented  · 

    Polymorph with chaining would be much better, than AES (Quantum Computer nowadays exists)....

  4. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    tonja shared this idea  · 
  5. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    tonja shared this idea  · 
  6. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    tonja supported this idea  · 
  7. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    tonja commented  · 

    Some workaround would be some link-type filter (as soon as it would be implemented in PB7)

    http://forums.thebrain.com/post/filter-linktype-5738326?pid=1272610808#post1272610808

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    tonja commented  · 

    Important would be to switch layer on and off and to build links between the layers (even multiple layers, if some thoughts are synchronous, to avoid the administration overhead).
    (Even there exists 12 different views on the same world in the philosophy).
    One Expample: The solastic layer (presentation of some context in the universities of today) and the personal layer (the personal interpretation, how is the best way to see and structure this context).

  8. 9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    tonja supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    tonja commented  · 

    Yes that's a big prob to keep the balance between the efficiency to type/copy in fast new content and to keep the network consistent (free of lots of stupid redundancies).

    I suggest that in the customizing I can chose between the traditional inline comma-trick look and feel OR
    some new look and feel in a popup-table.
    Focused Node: N00
    N01 exist already in the network
    Input: N1;N2;N3;No
    The customizing setting is: New table look and feel for sequential inputs
    System response:
    N1
    N2
    N3
    (N01) ->N01

    The last has the suggestion not to duplicate
    and instead generate the link to the already existing ->N01.

    But if I like I can force (via some toggle-button) to duplicate N01 in my network.
    OR make it context sensitive N00-N01 (which is also a unique result for my network).

    Greetings...

  9. 40 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    tonja supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    tonja commented  · 

    Perfect for the presentation mode!

    http://forums.thebrain.com/post/quite-nice-5732594