Settings and activity
11 results found
-
58 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment 
Spacenexus
commented
Thanks Zenrain for getting this on the docket. Number1 critical feature addition in my view!
I've just added another suggested to one of the add manual sorting threads in the forum: https://forums.thebrain.com/post/request-to-add-manual-sorting-3437-12478410?pid=1340455447
Best
Jim
Spacenexus
supported this idea
·
-
29 votesSpacenexus
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Spacenexus
commented
And adding to the great comments below, I have thousands of papers, documents and websites that I have collected that are yet to be brained. I used to stockpile them in Evernote but now use the brainbox which is working seamlessly these days. Currently I have all my urls that I would like to organize sitting in an intermediary brain under a single holding thought.
As an extension to David's and Dan's requests, I would like to be able to organize those url thoughts under the correct parent thought, and make sure the thought name is correctly titled.
I also have thousands of papers and documents that I would similarly like to drag into my brain, and have The Brain automatically display the correct full title with year and then select a main trunk thought that it should be a child of. I would like the choice to constrain to a few dozen thoughts that are parent candidates (or leave it open). There should also be a choice of number of jump thoughts to link. I imagine there could be 1,000+ jump thoughts that a Brain Agent (Bragent?) might locate, but I don't need that level of connectivity. Just the top 10-20 jumps is probably more than enough based on the algorithm's assessment of relevance.
Combine this with manual sorting (or add an agent function for publication date of document) and we have a winner.
I know that the inability to sort or to have The Brain automatically configure thought order based on thought content date rather than thought manipulation date was a showstopper for several folks adopting The Brain. This combined capability outlined above basically removes a possibly the biggest barrier to adoption for new customers since v1 - how to integrate existing sets of data and content into The Brain whilst retaining the original ordering and classification. I was personally lucky since I was using mind maps from when I was a kid and was able to port from DOS and then Windows mindmap programs to The Brain. The world has gotten too impatient for the depths of information curation and gardening that makes for effective Brains. Even the pace of pertinent information flow means I need help keeping my knowledge base up to date and well curated. My priority is the information retrieval in the moment I need it, not the information curation, which now definitely needs augmented support to keep up.
Along with manual sort, which may need to evolve to augmented sort with criteria, we would then have truly game-changing power at our fingertips!
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Spacenexus
commented
Referencing the forum discussion: https://forums.thebrain.com/post/interlink-all-jumps-13530323?trail=15
Spacenexus
shared this idea
·
-
14 votesSpacenexus
supported this idea
·
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Spacenexus
commented
Referencing the forum post: https://forums.thebrain.com/post/thought-encryption-13524041?pid=1341226340
Spacenexus
shared this idea
·
-
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Spacenexus
commented
Forum discussion on this topic can be found here" https://forums.thebrain.com/post/remote-management-of-brain-installations-for-security-13523406
Spacenexus
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Spacenexus
commented
Great idea, I've made some comments on the forum recently about the sequencing of search results. This is a good call to include in the mix.
-
11 votesSpacenexus
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Spacenexus
commented
I think an Option toggle for Enable / Disable is an easy and understandable request!
-
31 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Spacenexus
commented
Related to this post I just made on the forum: https://forums.thebrain.com/post/ai-indexing-and-generative-reporting-d66-13358159?pid=1340454195
I think it's a noBrainer to implement!
Spacenexus
supported this idea
·
-
20 votesSpacenexus
supported this idea
·
-
45 votesSpacenexus
supported this idea
·
I just added a comment in the Brain AI Assistant feature request (https://thebrain.uservoice.com/forums/4597-thebrain-feature-suggestions/suggestions/48519569-introduce-a-really-thebrain-ai-assistant) that underpins the need not only for manual sorting, but AI Augmented Sorting with various defined criteria. These two capabilities combined would be game-changing.