182 results found

1. With AI, I want Talk to my Brain

   I've been doing this with chatgpt where I add my extensive notes as training data and explore ideas with the AI in a oral conversational level.

   the AI reminds me on the notes that I've written down but forgot about and the AI helps me compare and add to the ideas that I have

   I'd like to have this feature with TheBrain.

   4 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Add Context-sensitive Thought Names functionality to the brain 15

   I cannot find the setting to hide the parent thought in context-sensitive child thought names in TheBrain 15. I very much like that economical view and hope it can be added soon if it has not already been added.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. iOS: Add Setting to Disable Tap-to-Edit Notes

   Frequently, when scrolling through notes on the iOS app, an unintended tap is registered, causing the application to enter edit mode.

   I would appreciate the addition of a setting that allows users to disable tap-to-edit functionality, so that entering Edit mode requires using the Pencil button.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. What features would make TheBrain easier

   For beginners, TheBrain could become easier to use with a more guided onboarding experience and simplified default settings. A step-by-step tutorial that demonstrates creating, linking, and organizing thoughts would help new users quickly understand the basics. Pre-made templates for common use cases—like project planning, personal knowledge management, or journaling—would reduce the learning curve. Clearer visual cues, such as icons or color-coded categories, could make navigation more intuitive. Contextual tips and an integrated help assistant would provide guidance without overwhelming users. Overall, combining simplicity with gradual exposure to advanced features would make TheBrain more beginner-friendly while retaining its depth.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. Close Thought properties as a feature on Mac.

   I noticed on the presentation which Matt offered about Version 15, the "Thought Properties" on his Windows machine were turned off. This should be available on the Mac, or a clean look.

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Sort Thoughts by Note word count

   Add the ability to sort Thoughts by Note word count (the number of words in a Note associated to a Thought). This way we can immediately tell, among a large number of Thoughts, which have notes with more or less content, thereby determining the importance of the Thought/Note.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Have a local globe where you can enter geo-location coordinates

   You could create a separate section like the timeline section and have a spot where you can plug in where in the world something might have happened. There are opensource Google Earth-type websites out there with free data and low-poly Earth spheres. Would be just an extra feature to be able to input and export data with, which I believe is one of TheBrain's biggest strengths.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Watched Folder of Markdown Files

   Hi all, really excited about the new release. My request involves having a folder on the filesystem that is watched and any markdown files inside this folder are automatically added as children of the folder thought in TheBrain. Ideally, this would also support a kind of bi-directional sync or live view of the markdown files so no matter which tool they are worked on (e.g. TheBrain, markdown editors, etc) the thoughts in TheBrain contain (or can point to and display) the latest version of the file.

   I know this has been mentioned a few times in forums but doesn't seem to have taken off despite the interest, so I wanted to add another request as it would really eliminate one of the main points of friction for using TheBrain for my use case - which is indexing and adding TheBrain's additional layer of complexity for between-note linking onto my collection of markdown notes.

   Hi all, really excited about the new release. My request involves having a folder on the filesystem that is watched and any markdown files inside this folder are automatically added as children of the folder thought in TheBrain. Ideally, this would also support a kind of bi-directional sync or live view of the markdown files so no matter which tool they are worked on (e.g. TheBrain, markdown editors, etc) the thoughts in TheBrain contain (or can point to and display) the latest version of the file.

   I know this has been mentioned a few times in forums but doesn't seem… more

   1 vote

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Another level of Team permission... "drafter / commenter"

   I'd like to suggest another level of permission for Team Brain, which I'm considering for a client as an organizational learning tool.

   I don't want anybody to be able to change everything, either intentionally or accidentally.

   But I want everyone to be able to contribute.

   Would a drafter / commenter permission be possible? Where a user could add a thought, but not delete other thoughts? Writer / Administers could edit and add the though.

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. AI chat with the whole brain

    The ability to query the whole brain and all brains similarly to what Recall has done. And then the ability to add the answer as a new thought to the Brain.

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Please fix the "jump thought issue"

    I make extensive use of jump thoughts, as they are also a wonderful way to display the (previously selected) elements of the current thought to which they are attached. And since there is a keyboard shortcut for creating such a jump thought, it is a fairly straightforward way to add them, but only as long as the jump thought does not already exist somewhere in the Brain. Then the keyboard shortcut Ctrl-K no longer works and no jump thought is created. And if I explicitly click on “+ Create jump”, a new thought with the same name will be created, which means that you suddenly have 2 thoughts with the same name – the new, empty one and the existing one. This makes no sense at all, in my opinion, and can only be a bug. But maybe I'm wrong?

    I make extensive use of jump thoughts, as they are also a wonderful way to display the (previously selected) elements of the current thought to which they are attached. And since there is a keyboard shortcut for creating such a jump thought, it is a fairly straightforward way to add them, but only as long as the jump thought does not already exist somewhere in the Brain. Then the keyboard shortcut Ctrl-K no longer works and no jump thought is created. And if I explicitly click on “+ Create jump”, a new thought with the same name will be created,… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Please fix the "jump thought issue"

    At least I guess that it can only be a bug:
    I make extensive use of jump thoughts, as they are also a wonderful way to display all the topics of a thought to which they are attached - sort of a keyword index/overview for a given thought.

    In order to create one, I use the corresonding keyboard shortcut (Ctrl-K). Pretty straightforward - but only if the thought to be created does not already exist (somewhere in the brain). Because when you then select the already existing thought from the selection window, a link is created but NOT the corresponding jump thought.

    And if I do explicitly click on “+ Create jump” (as the first option), then a new thought with the same name is actually created, which means that you suddenly have 2 thoughts with the same name – the new, empty one and the existing one. This makes no sense at all, in my opinion, and can only be a bug. But maybe I'm wrong?

    At least I guess that it can only be a bug:
    I make extensive use of jump thoughts, as they are also a wonderful way to display all the topics of a thought to which they are attached - sort of a keyword index/overview for a given thought.

    In order to create one, I use the corresonding keyboard shortcut (Ctrl-K). Pretty straightforward - but only if the thought to be created does not already exist (somewhere in the brain). Because when you then select the already existing thought from the selection window, a link is created but NOT the corresponding… more

    •  

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Make the lines of a YouTube video's table of contents “clickable/usable”

    Make the lines of a YouTube video's table of contents “clickable/usable”
    Just as an example:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTSRx78Aac8
    When you click on this link, you will see a YouTube video – like millions of others. Then click on “More” and you will (hopefully) see a few lines that represent the content of the video (like a table of contents) and the corresponding time code at the beginning of each line.
    This makes it easy to jump to a specific point in a longer video.
    I would be delighted if theBrain would one day retain these links when I insert text like this into a note.
    The only software (that I know of) that retains both the text structure (line by line) and the corresponding time code is Thunderbird.
    All other programs I have tested do not retain these links – or – if they do, they cannot retain the line breaks at the end of each line.
    If this sounds interesting to you – even if I haven't been able to explain it very clearly – just copy a text like this into a note and you'll see what I mean.
    If you paste it as “unformatted text,” you'll get a nice copy of it – but the time codes will be lost.
    Pasting it as is only creates a mess of lose words with no structure at all.

    There is a workaround for this, but it requires the use of several other programs, which is feasible but time-consuming.

    Make the lines of a YouTube video's table of contents “clickable/usable”
    Just as an example:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTSRx78Aac8
    When you click on this link, you will see a YouTube video – like millions of others. Then click on “More” and you will (hopefully) see a few lines that represent the content of the video (like a table of contents) and the corresponding time code at the beginning of each line.
    This makes it easy to jump to a specific point in a longer video.
    I would be delighted if theBrain would one day retain these links when I insert text like this… more

    •  

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Improve the timeline feature and add a new chronology feature to the brain map so specific temporal-based relationships can be visualized!

    Note: This is a general idea, I'm not suggesting the features should work exactly like how I laid out, but more what end result / function should be strived for (ie. chronologically organizing information in a more selective way)

    To provide context:
    I'm interested in mapping connections / relationships between individuals. It's very important to be able to do this, as understanding relationships between individuals is critical for analysing potential conflicts of interest, including historically.

    The individuals are the bedrock "child thoughts" of my brain.

    Their parent thoughts will be things which bundle people together such as organisations, movements, maybe locations, publications (books ect.).

    So sibling thoughts of a given child thought will be based on the bundling-factors that individual partakes in (for instance, what organisations they are part of).

    Jump thoughts will be other individuals they have a 1 to 1 connection with such as being friends (assuming we've not mapped their friendship group as a parent thought).

    This model is great but it has two big problems.

    Two individual may be part of an organisation but at completely different times, so their shared membership may not be a good indicator that they have a relationship.

    Also, an individual's precise relationship to an organisation may change across time.

    I've described 3 problems (A,B,C) and their respective solutions below.

    The problem:
    A. Currently the timeline feature only allows us to state an event / time period and map that to one individual. This already creates a problem for the above model.

    If I want to track who is the chairman of an organisation at any given time. I could add an event / time period under each relevant individual to show their tenure as chairman.

    But ideally I'd also want that to be under the content / notes of the organisation (when I click on that idea), so already that would require two seperate events to be created to describe one event in reality.

    B. The second big problem is if I simply wanted to see the temporal relationship between two individuals, by seeing what they're getting up to or which organisations they're members of at different times, it currently isn't easy at all to do.

    Likewise, if I wanted to see an organisation's timeline and compare it to one or more individual's behaviour overtime, this is also not easy to do.

    Why is this? Well because it's currently not possible to toggle or control which events show up on the timeline. All have to show up at once, making it so it can get crowed extremely quickly and easily.

    C. The third big problem relates to the brain mapping itself, which may be preferable to the timeline as a means to represent connections which just exist during a given period of time.

    Currently the connections between ideas aren't at all impacted by time. So using the model I set out above, I can just show who was part of an organisation at any point in time, but not who was part of an organisation for a given time period.

    I could get around this by making an organisation into a parent idea and then make it so each year of that organisation's existence is a child idea.

    However this would of course significantly complicate the brain model, and any given unit of time I try to use would be arbitrary.

    If the chairman changed multiple times within a year lets say, then I'd have to label multiple child connections as 'chairman'.

    Information about who was specifically the chairman when will be lost if I try to gleam it from the brain model (instead of the notes).

    The solution:
    A.The first quick fix is simply to allow groups of thoughts to be added to one event.

    That way, when someone becomes chairman of a company, for instance, I could put both the thought of that company and the individual under the same event so it doesn't clog up the timeline as much.

    Also, ideally the instead of the timeline showing [thought - label], the label is what should be shown, then maybe a list of the associated thoughts. That way we have more control over what we want to see in the condensed display on the timeline.

    B. This problem would also be relatively easy to fix. All that would be needed is a feature where you can search up and tick which thoughts are visible, which would make it so only events those thoughts have been tied to show up.

    You could further enhance this by optionally allowing the user in this toggle menu to select which events (tied to the selected idea) specifically show up or not.

    That way, the user would have excellent control over which events are actually visible or not, allowing them to have an easy chronological comparision of different individuals / thoughts behaviour across time.

    The user would be able to control the complexity and how many events and / or the thoughts associated with them are being shown at once.

    This could be further optimized with an optional view showing other thoughts (in addition to those the user themselves selected) which are associated with the events that are visible (contigent upon the thoughts selected by the user)

    That way, this additional view would allow you to see all thoughts / individuals also associated with the events your selected thoughts / individuals are involved in.

    Whilst the normal view would allow you to compare what only your selected individuals are doing at given times without this added complexity.

    C. To overcome this limitation, i'd recommend making two changes.

    First of all, make it so thoughts themselves have an ingrained time / period feature.
    This will make it so if I have a thought for an individual or organisation, I could encode the chronological dates regarding when it was born / created and then died / stopped existing.

    Second of all, I'd recommend adding the exact same feature to links themselves.

    However, given that an individuals connection to others or organisations change overtime, I'd recommend enabling there to be more than one time-period in a link with a different label attatched to it.

    It could be toggled so that it's up to the user whether these dates / the period show up when hovering over an idea or a link with the cursor.

    But more importantly, a feature should be added to enable the user to set what time period they want the brain to display.

    For instance, in a brain storing organisations and individuals as ideas, I could set the period I want to see between 2015-2020.
    Any organisations or individuals which only existed before or after this period wouldn't show up.

    The same would be true for links. If a person was only part of an organisation between 2012-2014, their connection to the organisation would no longer be visible

    All the whilst, that individual could still show up if they existed in 2015-2020, and their connections to other ideas would be shown.

    How specific the time period is can be completely controlled by the user. Therefore, they'll be able to both have rich information about connections during a specific time or have rich information about connections more generally if chronology isn't so important to them. All gleamed from a visual display.

    Adding this feature would make the software have an entire new dimension and means of visually organising information. It would be very very powerful.

    As an example:
    Let's say a company had 3 seperate chairmen within a year. I may only care about who was involved in the company under one of those chairmen.

    I could:
    Hover over the link between that individual and company to see when they were a chairman.

    Then I'd set the global temporal period to match that so I only see individuals and connections which existed for that time-period.

    If I wanted to do the same for the other chairmen, or just look at connections as a whole, I could then do that on the exact same model, simply by changing the global time period toggle!

    P. S.
    To make gauging what time-period to change to easier, I'm sure features could be added.

    For instance, a search function for could exist for links (which first puts "default" into the first thought which is just whatever the active thought is) and then you type in the second thought, and this gives you a list of each link and the time period involved which exists between them.

    And maybe a scroller could be added so you can quickly zoom through different time periods and see how the links change for whatever the active thought is.

    Note: This is a general idea, I'm not suggesting the features should work exactly like how I laid out, but more what end result / function should be strived for (ie. chronologically organizing information in a more selective way)

    To provide context:
    I'm interested in mapping connections / relationships between individuals. It's very important to be able to do this, as understanding relationships between individuals is critical for analysing potential conflicts of interest, including historically.

    The individuals are the bedrock "child thoughts" of my brain.

    Their parent thoughts will be things which bundle people together such as organisations, movements, maybe… more

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. selection and working with text with certain styling attributes

    While in the note editor on desktop and iPad, allow us to use a selective filter that can select OR filter text with certain attributes such as:

    • All text in the note that has any background color
    • or a certain background color or set of background colors
    • optionally bolded, or italicized or a certain heading level or other style attribute

    Once this has been filtered, allow us to create a thought attached to the current thought (child, parent or jump) with the filtered text as the new thought's note including the source text's style attributes intact. The filtered text can optionally be sorted and/or grouped in the order of appearance in the note or grouped by selected attributes. Alternatively, let us copy the filtered text to the clipboard including its style attributes and ordering/grouping along with a link reference to the source thought/note.

    While in the note editor on desktop and iPad, allow us to use a selective filter that can select OR filter text with certain attributes such as:

    • All text in the note that has any background color
    • or a certain background color or set of background colors
    • optionally bolded, or italicized or a certain heading level or other style attribute

    Once this has been filtered, allow us to create a thought attached to the current thought (child, parent or jump) with the filtered text as the new thought's note including the source text's style attributes intact. The filtered text can… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. set background color of note text from keyboard

    Color coding text and text backgrounds is important to my work. Allow me to type a keyboard sequence to set the background color or text color in the note editor such as: command-shift-B-2-3-return to set background color to the light orange background appearing at column 3 and row 2 of the color picker. This will allow me to quickly learn and use a common set of sequences for the colors I use most often. While typing the sequence, the color picker should highlight the first item of the column and then the chosen row. If I wish to change the column and row, I can type a new pair of numbers until I hit return. If I type only one number and return the top color of that column is applied to the text or the background. I need this for desktop and iPad versions.

    Color coding text and text backgrounds is important to my work. Allow me to type a keyboard sequence to set the background color or text color in the note editor such as: command-shift-B-2-3-return to set background color to the light orange background appearing at column 3 and row 2 of the color picker. This will allow me to quickly learn and use a common set of sequences for the colors I use most often. While typing the sequence, the color picker should highlight the first item of the column and then the chosen row. If I wish to change the… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Be able to toggle on/off or hide labels in the web browser

    It would be nice to be able to have a switch in settings to toggle on/off labels in the web browser as scrolling over the Thoughts in the browser with labels popping up can be distracting and overwhelming visually.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. Hide thought types on iOS

    It would be super helpful if there were an option to hide thought types in the plex on iOS. Occasionally I accidentally tap on a thought type and it causes the app to hang for 10+ minutes if the type is used frequently.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Show videos without having to download

    Show videos without having to download them.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Enable Single-Key Activation for event change Popup Menu Choices Body:

    I’d like to suggest an enhancement that would significantly improve workflow efficiency and keyboard accessibility.
    When modifying an event and dismissing the properties popup, a contextual menu appears with four choices: Cancel, Only this, All the following, and All in the series. Currently, these options require mouse interaction or multi-step keyboard navigation.
    It would be incredibly helpful if each option could be activated with a single keystroke—specifically c, o, a, and s—corresponding to the first letter of each item. This lightweight mnemonic-style activation would eliminate the need to switch between mouse and keyboard, making it easier to stay in flow during rapid task edits.
    This proposal aligns with common accessibility and usability practices seen in many applications, where single-key triggers or first-letter shortcuts streamline interaction. It offers both ergonomic and cognitive benefits with minimal implementation overhead.
    Thank you for considering this improvement—it would be a small yet powerful enhancement to an already brilliant tool.
    Best regards,
    James

    I’d like to suggest an enhancement that would significantly improve workflow efficiency and keyboard accessibility.
    When modifying an event and dismissing the properties popup, a contextual menu appears with four choices: Cancel, Only this, All the following, and All in the series. Currently, these options require mouse interaction or multi-step keyboard navigation.
    It would be incredibly helpful if each option could be activated with a single keystroke—specifically c, o, a, and s—corresponding to the first letter of each item. This lightweight mnemonic-style activation would eliminate the need to switch between mouse and keyboard, making it easier to stay in flow… more

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating